| |
UNIONS, FIRMS, BACK ROUTE OF O.C. TOLL ROAD
A coalition wants to intervene in a lawsuit that seeks to halt construction of an extension
across San Onofre State Beach.
Los Angeles Times
July 12, 2006
By David Reyes
A coalition of Orange County's major employers, businesses and labor groups took legal
action Tuesday to support the extension of a toll road through San Onofre State Beach.
The group is asking a court's permission to intervene in a lawsuit that seeks to
block the project. Whether the permission will be granted will be decided at a hearing in
October.
The group's effort to support the toll road agency was announced at a news
conference in Santa Ana. Business leaders acknowledged that the controversial 16-mile
planned extension had raised strong environmental concerns but said the project would
create jobs and a healthy regional economy.
The state and a dozen environmental groups have sued to block the project, which
they say would harm the environment at one of the state's landmark surf spots.
But business leaders said the alternative was worse.
"Extending the toll road is critical to the area's economy," said Lucy Dunn, chief
executive for the Orange County Business Council. "The alternative is to destroy
hundreds of homes" for a new road alignment that would cut through several southern
Orange County communities, she said.
The coalition includes the business council, Los Angeles and Orange County
Building and Construction Trades Council, black and Latino chambers of commerce and
southern Orange County chambers of commerce.
Ruben Smith, an attorney representing the coalition, has asked the court for
permission to join the case.
He said labor groups and businesses had a stake in whether the toll road was
constructed.
In February, the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency in Orange
County approved extending the toll road from Oso Parkway in Rancho Santa Margarita
to Interstate 5 at Basilone Road, south of San Clemente.
But a month later, state Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer and environmental organization
sued in state court in San Diego to block construction and preserve the popular park.
"TCA chose to build this road without evaluating its toll on a state park that is an
affordable recreational resource for families in the region," said Teresa Schilling,
Lockyer's spokeswoman.
"Had TCA employed vision and leadership, we could be breaking ground on a
project that meets regional transportation needs without destroying a state treasure," she
said.
Toll road officials have said an extension is the only option. That can reduce
traffic in the south county area. They said congestion on Interstate 5 was projects to
increase 60 % by 2025.
Widening I-5 would destroy hundreds of homes and businesses and eliminate
jobs, the toll agency has said.
At the new conference, labor leaders said they did not want to appear insensitive
to the environment. But consideration of jobs and the economy may outweigh putting a
toll road close to a state beach.
"These are tough choices," Dunn said. "But you can't live in an environment
where you can get your cake and eat it too."
Toll road critics said there were alternative routes avoiding the state park.
"I think their argument sets up a false choice, because it's not a choice between
transportation or the park, or business and the park," said Sara Feldman, Southern
California director of the California state parks Foundation, a nonprofit group.
Last month, the toll road agency won a small victory when Assemblyman Pedro
Nava (D-Santa Barbara) and others inserted language in the state budget prohibiting the
agency from building the toll road through San Onofre State Beach and a conference
committee of senators and Assembly members voted it down.
|
|